Major GAS attack
Feb 12, 2018 12:14:57 #
[quote=aphelps]Looks like a little too much money and not enough common sense. Perhaps a dash of ego thrown in for good measure. Unfortunately, no known cure except, perhaps, running out of cash.[/quote
Several photographers got together and took a funny picture. It’s very funny!!
Several photographers got together and took a funny picture. It’s very funny!!
Feb 12, 2018 12:26:36 #
Feb 12, 2018 12:54:44 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
aphelps wrote:
Looks like a little too much money and not enough common sense. Perhaps a dash of ego thrown in for good measure. Unfortunately, no known cure except, perhaps, running out of cash.
When I was a photo journalist, there were times I felt like that.
Feb 12, 2018 13:17:45 #
Is this anyone's hobby: just walk behind him and pick up any gear that he loses and doesn't notice?
Feb 12, 2018 14:10:57 #
I just right-clicked on shot and selected "save picture" or something like that. I now have it in my Funny Photos file.
Feb 12, 2018 14:13:38 #
That picture is a gas.
Looks like he is using a plastic cup as a lens hood for the 100-400 ? On his back
It has to be a joke
The cameras would clank together ad he walked.
I will be saving this picture. I want permission to use it for my uglyhog profile pic.
This picture draws me in. I want to make a complete list of the gear. Great composition.
Looks like he is using a plastic cup as a lens hood for the 100-400 ? On his back
It has to be a joke
The cameras would clank together ad he walked.
I will be saving this picture. I want permission to use it for my uglyhog profile pic.
This picture draws me in. I want to make a complete list of the gear. Great composition.
Feb 12, 2018 14:19:05 #
camerapapi wrote:
"I could do a decent job with just two of my lenses. 24-120 f/4 and 150-600 tele zoom."
Well, you have someone that agrees with you. If a f2.8 is not a necessity those two lenses should take care of the majority if not all the images to be made.
Well, you have someone that agrees with you. If a f2.8 is not a necessity those two lenses should take care of the majority if not all the images to be made.
Looks like a Golf match. Probably good light. Just bump up the ISO a bit.
Feb 12, 2018 15:57:55 #
photoman022
Loc: Manchester CT USA
I wouldn't laugh at him. I have 3 DSLRs, each with a different telephoto lens combination. I never threw away my "old" cameras when I bought a "new" one. This year I took a coast to coast trip to California and back. I had each camera on the front seat of the car. When I stopped at the side of the road I didn't have to change lenses, I just took the camera/lens package I wanted and shot away. There were scenes where I used all three cameras. Not having to change lenses was great (especially in Death Valley)!
Feb 12, 2018 16:12:28 #
Same here with my 24-105mm lens and 100-400mm lens.
r.grossner wrote:
I could do a decent job with just two of my lenses. 24-120 f/4 and 150-600 tele zoom.
Feb 12, 2018 16:14:35 #
aphelps wrote:
Looks like a little too much money and not enough common sense. Perhaps a dash of ego thrown in for good measure. Unfortunately, no known cure except, perhaps, running out of cash.
If a guy has an ego and is showing they usually leave the knee pads at home.
The only way to tell if he is waiting time is to see his images
Feb 12, 2018 16:18:38 #
Feb 12, 2018 16:57:18 #
Feb 12, 2018 16:57:57 #
Feb 12, 2018 17:20:52 #
Feb 12, 2018 17:32:35 #
FRENCHY wrote:
Must be a bitch to go fast to the bathroom to take a leak !
Come on Frenchy, don’t you have any bladder control?
Before they go out to shoot, real pros pee before they go out to shoot and squeeeeeze every last drop out, then are good to shoot for 12 straight hours!
Just lay off the beer!!!!!
SS
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.