Who the hell knows so what is it with all the threads about the future of cameras, manufacturers and the like?
Beside, all the 'debate' participants in those threads will be dead or dying if I understand UHH demographics, me included, I hope.
In the mean time? Enjoy the non sense and the mayhem.
Oh, by the way, what is best? The N? The C?
Enjoy flogging the horse, it is long dead and if it moves, it is not because it is reanimated by your posts but because it is turning in his grave wondering when it will stop being savaged time and time again. Oh, I saw a nostril fly off the other day... Debate was about what to take in a trip.
One more thing (riiiiiiiight)... raw or JPG? How about SOOC or PP?
Finally, can someone please tell me what is a photographer?
Rongnongno wrote:
Who the hell knows so what is it with all the threads about the future of cameras, manufacturers and the like?
Beside, all the 'debate' participants in those threads will be dead or dying if I understand UHH demographics, me included, I hope.
In the mean time? Enjoy the non sense and the mayhem.
Oh, by the way, what is best? The N? The C?
Enjoy flogging the horse, it is long dead and if it moves, it is not because it is reanimated by your posts but because it is turning in his grave wondering when it will stop being savaged time and time again. Oh, I saw a nostril fly off the other day... Debate was about what to take in a trip.
One more thing (riiiiiiiight)... raw or JPG? How about SOOC or PP?
Finally, can someone please tell me what is a photographer?
Who the hell knows so what is it with all the thre... (
show quote)
Chill out Ron, life goes on.
Rongnongno wrote:
Who the hell knows so what is it with all the threads about the future of cameras, manufacturers and the like?
Beside, all the 'debate' participants in those threads will be dead or dying if I understand UHH demographics, me included, I hope.
In the mean time? Enjoy the non sense and the mayhem.
Oh, by the way, what is best? The N? The C?
Enjoy flogging the horse, it is long dead and if it moves, it is not because it is reanimated by your posts but because it is turning in his grave wondering when it will stop being savaged time and time again. Oh, I saw a nostril fly off the other day... Debate was about what to take in a trip.
One more thing (riiiiiiiight)... raw or JPG? How about SOOC or PP?
Finally, can someone please tell me what is a photographer?
Who the hell knows so what is it with all the thre... (
show quote)
Who cares about what will happen. It won't really effect my making photographs much. Equipment doesn't matter, images do.
What will change my photography more than technological advancements will be how I change and grow as a person and the experiences I will have..
Bunko.T wrote:
Chill out Ron, life goes on.
You should... Ever heard of tongue in cheek?
Yes, it is a provocation, a good humored at that.
BHC
Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
Rongnongno wrote:
Who the hell knows so what is it with all the threads about the future of cameras, manufacturers and the like?
Beside, all the 'debate' participants in those threads will be dead or dying if I understand UHH demographics, me included, I hope.
In the mean time? Enjoy the non sense and the mayhem.
Oh, by the way, what is best? The N? The C?
Enjoy flogging the horse, it is long dead and if it moves, it is not because it is reanimated by your posts but because it is turning in his grave wondering when it will stop being savaged time and time again. Oh, I saw a nostril fly off the other day... Debate was about what to take in a trip.
One more thing (riiiiiiiight)... raw or JPG? How about SOOC or PP?
Finally, can someone please tell me what is a photographer?
Who the hell knows so what is it with all the thre... (
show quote)
If forced to do so, California Law would define a photographer as anyone who claims, believes or imagines himself/herself/itself to be a photographer.
BHC wrote:
If forced to do so, California Law would define a photographer as anyone who claims, believes or imagines himself/herself/itself to be a photographer.
That can lead to endless debate here.... GO FOR IT!!!!
Darkroom317 wrote:
Who cares about what will happen. It won't really effect my making photographs much. Equipment doesn't matter, images do.
What will change my photography more than technological advancements will be how I change and grow as a person and the experiences I will have..
Now THAT is another debate!!! Poor horse... It will never stop!
My wife hopes that in 20 years my newest camera or lens is 20 years old.
BHC wrote:
If forced to do so, California Law would define a photographer as anyone who claims, believes or imagines himself/herself/itself to be a photographer.
A subsection of the law mandates that a gallery that hosts a photo contest must give all participants an “honorable mention” certificate suitable for framing. In addition, each gallery must provide a safe room for those photographers whose feelings were hurt by not winning 1st place.
DirtFarmer
Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
travelwp wrote:
A subsection of the law mandates that a gallery that hosts a photo contest must give all participants an “honorable mention” certificate suitable for framing. In addition, each gallery must provide a safe room for those photographers whose feelings were hurt by not winning 1st place.
No problem. You just declare a tie between all entrants for first place.
BHC
Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
I’d love to, but so many people know how laws are wtriien in the state of Californication, they can’t think of a reasonable counter-argument. Besides, if we start discussing laws here, the opinions will be so “ interesting” this thread will end up in the attic.
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
Rongnongno wrote:
Who the hell knows so what is it with all the threads about the future of cameras, manufacturers and the like?
Beside, all the 'debate' participants in those threads will be dead or dying if I understand UHH demographics, me included, I hope.
In the mean time? Enjoy the non sense and the mayhem.
Oh, by the way, what is best? The N? The C?
Enjoy flogging the horse, it is long dead and if it moves, it is not because it is reanimated by your posts but because it is turning in his grave wondering when it will stop being savaged time and time again. Oh, I saw a nostril fly off the other day... Debate was about what to take in a trip.
One more thing (riiiiiiiight)... raw or JPG? How about SOOC or PP?
Finally, can someone please tell me what is a photographer?
Who the hell knows so what is it with all the thre... (
show quote)
The Canikolymptaxosnic Camera Company will preview their Photo Contact Lens with 8 Tb of internal memory. You will no longer need a camera, computer or any additional lenses, cables, etc to take pictures or movies. Just open your eyes and 'think" picture, and the image/video will be recorded. Blink to start capture, blink to stop. The 8 tb of working storage will be augmented by the 90% of unused memory in the brain. Accessories for future release will include a scalable sharing module that will allow you to share your images with anywhere from one to 100,000 other people, and automatic real time backup. There's more, but I don't want to give away any more info.
BHC
Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
BHC wrote:
I’d love to, but so many people know how laws are wtriien in the state of Californication, they can’t think of a reasonable counter-argument. Besides, if we start discussing laws here, the opinions will be so “ interesting” this thread will end up in the attic.
I are goin 2 bee a lawe riter inn Caffilornia ass sune ass eye kan lern 2 spell "written".
I see nothing wrong with a little harmless speculation on future photographic trends and developing technologies. Perhaps there's even an opportunity to get a head start before everyone else!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.