Have you Ever used a Medium Format Camera?
Sep 13, 2017 04:04:29 #
GoofyNewfie wrote:
BTW, there are also mirrorless medium format digital cameras.
Hasselblad and Fuji come to mind.
Hasselblad and Fuji come to mind.
Yes, but why would you want to go mirror-less in a Medium Format Camera?
Sep 13, 2017 05:33:51 #
ChrisT wrote:
A DSLR, or was it a film camera?
Yes. Both.
Sep 13, 2017 05:46:18 #
Sep 13, 2017 06:10:13 #
A.J.R.
Loc: Devon, UK
Adox Rangefinder Golf, Rolleicord v, Mamiyaflex C330, Mamiya 645, Hasselblad CM, Rolleiflex 2.8 F, and Rolleiflex 2.8 GX.
Sep 13, 2017 06:19:06 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
ChrisT wrote:
A DSLR, or was it a film camera?
Hasselblad, Bronica, Film.
Sep 13, 2017 06:59:58 #
ChrisT wrote:
A DSLR, or was it a film camera?
Film.
Yashica Mat 124G, Hasselblad 500C, Mamiya C 330.
Now what?
Sep 13, 2017 07:19:26 #
I owned a C330, but used a number of others for short periods. A friend bought everything under the sun from Hassy to Rollei. He left them at my house and whichever he decided to use for a month he told his wife he borrowed from me. She thought I was rich and wondered why they were so poor. Eventually his business took off and he wound up rich and I'm not. :(
---
---
Sep 13, 2017 07:21:27 #
Mamiya C33, Mamiya C330, Bronica SQ something, and Hassleblad CM, all film.
Sep 13, 2017 07:41:06 #
Yes, with film. Digital medium format is just a little to expensive for my blood today.
Sep 13, 2017 07:54:59 #
StaneeRae
Loc: Lincroft, NJ USA
Bronica SQ/A (6x6 film) back when I started shooting weddings. Later, Nikon F100 (film). Sold off both eventually.
Sep 13, 2017 07:55:33 #
Sep 13, 2017 08:16:02 #
Sep 13, 2017 08:36:26 #
Robert Bailey
Loc: Canada
I still have three versions of the Pentax 645.
I fact I'll be using one in a couple of days at a wedding.
A friend of mine is marrying a "mail order" bride from the Philippines.
Immigration services said to have some photos shot ON FILM to prove they got married.
The argument is that a digital image can be manipulated, but a film negative is a solid proof.
I fact I'll be using one in a couple of days at a wedding.
A friend of mine is marrying a "mail order" bride from the Philippines.
Immigration services said to have some photos shot ON FILM to prove they got married.
The argument is that a digital image can be manipulated, but a film negative is a solid proof.
Sep 13, 2017 08:53:29 #
Sep 13, 2017 08:55:20 #
CatMarley wrote:
Mamiya
And a mighty fine one, if I don't say so myself...thanks again.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.