Here's a little science for ya's! .

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

.

gmcase Loc: Galt's Gulch

👍👍

rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona

Now that is an excellent question. I would really enjoy watching a panel discussion of that.

idaholover wrote:

.

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

rmalarz wrote:

Now that is an excellent question. I would really enjoy watching a panel discussion of that.

I'm sure there would be no shortage of "junk science" involved and would eventually segue to climate change.

rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona

Now, that brought my first chuckle of the morning. I mean that in a good way.
--Bob

idaholover wrote:

I'm sure there would be no shortage of "junk science" involved and would eventually segue to climate change.

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

rmalarz wrote:

Now, that brought my first chuckle of the morning. I mean that in a good way.
--Bob

user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32

it is life, just not a human being by the definition of our currently Republican government... a human being's life begins at birth and ends at death... I'm sure science is going to stretch these limits at both ends, but this is currently our government's policy.

Go change it, if you don't agree instead of wasting all your time moaning about Obama and Hillary...

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

user47602 wrote:

it is life, just not a human being by the definition of our currently Republican government... a human being's life begins at birth and ends at death... I'm sure science is going to stretch these limits at both ends, but this is currently our government's policy.

Go change it, if you don't agree instead of wasting all your time moaning about Obama and Hillary...

So I guess it could become a hippopotamus then?

BigBear Loc: Northern CT

idaholover wrote:

So I guess it could become a hippopotamus then?

What was it that Margaret Sanger called them ?? Liberals ??

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

user47602 wrote:

it is life, just not a human being by the definition of our currently Republican government... a human being's life begins at birth and ends at death... I'm sure science is going to stretch these limits at both ends, but this is currently our government's policy.

Go change it, if you don't agree instead of wasting all your time moaning about Obama and Hillary...

Hey, the woman is dead so she is not a human life anymore. Why bother looking for the guy? Late term abortion no doubt.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/07/30/woman-found-dead-during-lockdown-in-minnesota-hunt-on-for-suspect.html

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

user47602 wrote:

it is life, just not a human being by the definition of our currently Republican government... a human being's life begins at birth and ends at death... I'm sure science is going to stretch these limits at both ends, but this is currently our government's policy.

Go change it, if you don't agree instead of wasting all your time moaning about Obama and Hillary...

BTW, why when a woman is pregnant and gets murdered leading to two deaths the perp is charged with two murders?

rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona

One just never knows. However, I wouldn't bet a lot of money on it.
--Bob

idaholover wrote:

So I guess it could become a hippopotamus then?

rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona

I've actually seen that in the news. I found it odd, as well.
--Bob

idaholover wrote:

BTW, why when a woman is pregnant and gets murdered leading to two deaths the perp is charged with two murders?

Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM

idaholover wrote:

BTW, why when a woman is pregnant and gets murdered leading to two deaths the perp is charged with two murders?

THAT is the current Progressive Paradox.

user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32

idaholover wrote:

BTW, why when a woman is pregnant and gets murdered leading to two deaths the perp is charged with two murders?

idaho, are you being an idiot on purpose? I totally agree with you, I am against abortion and I am against the government telling people what they can do with their own bodies...

I was just stating what the current legal definition of a human being is in our country today. I guess you didn't research the actual law you are quoting:

The legislation was both hailed and vilified by various legal observers who interpreted the measure as a step toward granting legal personhood to human fetuses, even though the bill explicitly contained a provision excepting abortion, stating that the bill would not "be construed to permit the prosecution" "of any person for conduct relating to an abortion for which the consent of the pregnant woman, or a person authorized by law to act on her behalf", "of any person for any medical treatment of the pregnant woman or her unborn child" or "of any woman with respect to her unborn child."