boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
In her commencement speech at Wellsley she claimed that one of the reasons she lost was a result of voter supression, So here are the raw popular votes of the last 3 presidential elections (rounded off). 2009- Obama 67million-McCain 58million. 2012- Obama 65 million- Romney 60 million. 2016- Hillary 66 million- Trump 63 million. So will some one please explain how Clinton's claim of voter supression makes sense. Pardon me if it sounds like clinton is a very sore looser. and still doesn't take responsiblity for her loss.
The population is growing.
JamesCurran wrote:
The population is growing.
Lol, you really are dumb!
ken hubert wrote:
Lol, you really are dumb!
You think the population is shrinking?
JamesCurran wrote:
You think the population is shrinking?
That wasn't the point he was making, duh!
ken hubert wrote:
That wasn't the point he was making, duh!
No, that as the point he was missing....
JamesCurran wrote:
No, that as the point he was missing....
Forgot that you are from Jersey. That explains a lot!
JamesCurran wrote:
You think the population is shrinking?
That is not the point, stupid.
FlyingTiger wrote:
That is not the point, stupid.
So, what exactly is the point he is making --- that can't be explained by a increasing population?
boberic wrote:
In her commencement speech at Wellsley she claimed that one of the reasons she lost was a result of voter supression, So here are the raw popular votes of the last 3 presidential elections (rounded off). 2009- Obama 67million-McCain 58million. 2012- Obama 65 million- Romney 60 million. 2016- Hillary 66 million- Trump 63 million. So will some one please explain how Clinton's claim of voter supression makes sense. Pardon me if it sounds like clinton is a very sore looser. and still doesn't take responsiblity for her loss.
In her commencement speech at Wellsley she claime... (
show quote)
She is a sore loser not to mention that liberal logic can't be explained..
JamesCurran wrote:
The population is growing.
Let's try this again dumbazz... 2009- Obama
67million-McCain 58million. 2012- Obama
65 million- Romney
60 million. 2016- Hillary
66 million- Trump 63 million
Obama in 2009 received 9 million more votes than McCain- total votes =
125K Obama in 2012 received 5 million more votes than Romney- total votes =
125K Hillary in 2016 received 3 million more votes than Trump- total votes =
129K All three past elections the Democrat candidate won the popular vote yet the total votes virtually stayed the same, with the exception of 2016 with 4 million more total votes. From 2009-2016 it appears that Dems lost 6 million votes and the Reps gained 5 million more votes since 2009. Where is this voter suppression?
JamesCurran wrote:
So, what exactly is the point he is making --- that can't be explained by a increasing population?
prove your point with facts not opinions.
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
JamesCurran wrote:
The population is growing.
The population is growing due to the influx of immigrants as well as illegals, who tend to vote democrat. Hillary's claim of voter supression is totally without merit
Keenan
Loc: Central Coast California
boberic wrote:
The population is growing due to the influx of immigrants as well as illegals, who tend to vote democrat. Hillary's claim of voter supression is totally without merit
Wrong. Net migration has been close to zero for the last 8 years. The population is growing primarily due to the birth rate of Americans.
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
Keenan wrote:
Wrong. Net migration has been close to zero for the last 8 years. The population is growing primarily due to the birth rate of Americans.
The nations birth rate is in DECLINE. The population as a result is aging as a result. The death rate is higher than the birth rate.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.