Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Wildlife lens for D7200
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Apr 21, 2017 07:02:40   #
cthahn
 
Order a Zeiss APO T* 1700mm F4. Then you will have the best of the best.

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 07:02:45   #
pahtspix
 
I have the Tamron 150-600mm g2 mated to my Nikon D500, and I couldn't be happier, I've owned this combo since late November with stellar results.. I could have had the Nikon 200-500 for the same money, but there were issues at that time of users not getting a sharp copy of that lens..My Tamron is tack sharp wide open at f6.3, gives me more range than the N
ikon, and is lighter with more features, andan incredible VC control for up to 4 stops of control..The 6 year warranty was also a decisive factor in my choice.

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 07:07:25   #
Jim Bob
 
imagemeister wrote:
option 1. I like the idea of a 300mm f4, maximize your image quality and crop if need be and use software pixel enlargement if need be. Try a 1.4X teleconverter with it to see how you like that also. Zoom with your feet.

Option 2. Get the bigger/heavier/ more expensive Nikon 200-500mm zoom lens. You will also need a support system to go with it if you are serious.


Good post. However, one should not underestimate the excellent optical stabilization on the 200-500. In many cases, I can do without a tripod. It's that good.

Reply
 
 
Apr 21, 2017 07:09:19   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
dsiner wrote:
I need some recommendations from experienced wildlife shooters for a good lens for my D7200. I have a tamron 16-300 and a nikon 55-300 but want more reach.



It looks like you want something in the 600mm range.
http://photo.net/equipment/150-600_lenses
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/latest/articles/tamron-vs-sigma-150-600mm-the-7-key-differences-48183
https://photographylife.com/nikon-200-500mm-vs-tamron-150-600mm-vs-sigma-150-600mm-c

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 07:29:32   #
Brucej67 Loc: Cary, NC
 
Gene51 wrote:
What is your budget?

The sharpest lenses under $2000 without having to resort to using a 1.4 TC would be the Sigma Sport 150-600, Tamron 150-600 G2, and the Nikon 200-500 in that order, though the Tamron and the Sigma are pretty much a tie. Truth is, there is not a lot of difference between them.

This article, plus some personal testing with borrowed copies of these lenses, helped me make the decision to get a used copy of the Sigma last fall.

https://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-200-500mm-f5-6e-vr/

While you can use any of these with their corresponding TCs, in doing so you lose an fstop, and autofocus performance suffers. All of these are sharpest if you stop the lens down about a stop, though F7.1 is a decent compromise on all three.

I also own a 600mm F4, which I take out when I am shooting in marginal light. The advantage of the zooms is that you don't necessarily need a tripod, since the stabilization is quite good. I've shot several thousand images with the Sigma and have yet to use it on a tripod.
What is your budget? br br The sharpest lenses un... (show quote)


I use the Sigma 150-600mm sport lens on the D7200 and D500 and get excellent results while on a tripod with a gimbal, but for hand held I like my Nikon 80-400mm lens. On the more expensive side I have the Nikon 300mm f2.8 and the Nikon 200-400mm lens, but both are tripod lenses.

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 07:47:01   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Jim Bob wrote:
Good post. However, one should not underestimate the excellent optical stabilization on the 200-500. In many cases, I can do without a tripod. It's that good.


It is not only a matter of being free from blurring, it is also a matter of ergonomics, mental concentration, and accuracy of composition and AF point.

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 08:28:00   #
sathca Loc: Narragansett Rhode Island
 
I have the Nikon 300f4 and the 200-500 5.6. The 300 hasn't seen much light since I got the 200-500. I purchased it over the sigma and tamron because the resale value will be higher if I decide to sell. They say the sigma 150-600 is a little sharper at some settings but it's a slight edge so I went with the Nikon which will hold its value, possibly because it will hold up longer. It's plenty sharp, you have to look hard to find the difference. I rented it for $100 for a weekend befor purchasing. It's heavy but I don't use a tripod. I just shoot fast enough even if it means a higher iso. I'm thrilled with these shots!











Reply
 
 
Apr 21, 2017 08:44:35   #
starlifter Loc: Towson, MD
 
You will be getting tons of replies as to what works for other people everybody's different, so for what it's worth here's my two cents worth. I don't have an unlimited budget for photography so I gave 2 lens' , my walk around nikkor 18-200 and my mostly birding sigma 150-600C. For the money I feel it's a very nice lens. Try to stay away from Tele convertors.

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 08:53:13   #
christinortham
 
I just bought the Tamron 150-600mm with the gimbal head. Wasn't sure if like it. Loving the gimbal and the lens. I may pick up the 1.4 teleconverter with it. Haven't decided

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 08:54:01   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
sathca wrote:
I have the Nikon 300f4 and the 200-500 5.6. The 300 hasn't seen much light since I got the 200-500. I purchased it over the sigma and tamron because the resale value will be higher if I decide to sell. They say the sigma 150-600 is a little sharper at some settings but it's a slight edge so I went with the Nikon which will hold its value, possibly because it will hold up longer. It's plenty sharp, you have to look hard to find the difference. I rented it for $100 for a weekend befor purchasing. It's heavy but I don't use a tripod. I just shoot fast enough even if it means a higher iso. I'm thrilled with these shots!
I have the Nikon 300f4 and the 200-500 5.6. The 3... (show quote)


The Nikon 200-500mm is an excellent lens and its light enough to hand hold. Their newer leases are much improved and some are excellent values. I am blown away by the 70-300 AF-P DX VR as well.

Good set; I especially like #1.

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 09:19:01   #
MichaelL
 
I use the 200-500 on my D7100. Great shots

Reply
 
 
Apr 21, 2017 09:21:13   #
Ricinus Loc: Leduc Alberta
 
Nikon 200 to 500 for me..

Mike

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 09:29:26   #
Ira
 
I use my Tamron 150-600 G2 with my D7200 and my D750. It works great on both.
This image was taken with the D7200 and the Tamron 150-600 G2


(Download)

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 10:16:08   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
Jerrin1 wrote:
I have a Nikkor 300mm f4 PF VR + Nikkor TC 14E III which I use with my D500. Brilliant results and very lightweight, though a little expensive. A month ago I bought a Nikkor 200 - 500mm f5.6 (which will also take the 1.4 TC) and it, too, is brilliant and cheaper, but heavier, than the 300mm. I have not used my 300mm since purchasing the 200 - 500mm. I shoot wildlife up to 5 -6 times a week and both lenses are excellent choices. Some people talk a load of tripe about fieldcraft or "moving your feet" to get the shot: but nothing beats a good long lens for wildlife.
I have a Nikkor 300mm f4 PF VR + Nikkor TC 14E III... (show quote)


Steve Perry has an excellent video comparing the use of the 300mm PF and the 200-500mm.

http://backcountrygallery.com/nikon-200-500-vs-300pf-review-and-comparison/

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 10:43:30   #
Leon S Loc: Minnesota
 
par4fore wrote:
I would suggest that "experienced wildlife shooters" do not use a zoom lens for reach. The 200-500 may be ok but at f5.6 and f8 with a tc I think a pro would not use it. IMO a 300mm on a crop body with a 1.4 is the best way to start.


I agree totally. The only thing to add to this is I use a D810 and at least a monopod or sand bag. Obviously a tripod and remote would be better yet.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.