Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon, Canon and the new Sony a9
Page <<first <prev 4 of 8 next> last>>
Apr 21, 2017 12:57:21   #
azted Loc: Las Vegas, NV.
 
Has nothing to do with your critique of Cholly, or Sony. You used the article to support your hypothesis, and with just one look, you failed!

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 13:03:47   #
Haydon
 
Desert Gecko wrote:
Canon does a lot right, which makes it number one. That's no fluke. It's certainly not number one because of its sensors, and I stand by my remark that the 5d4's sensor is Canon's first (in recent years, anyway) to be excited about. Sure, the 80d has a good sensor -- by five-year-old standards (actually, it doesn't even perform as well as some six- or seven-year-old crop sensors), but it's a fine camera and Canon offers a great system with great customer support. Nobody's denying that. My statement was, and was only, that Canon is way behind Sony and Nikon proprietary in sensor performance. The 5d4 is its first sensor that really stands out and offers notable performance -- even though it's still beat by a five-year-old Nikon.

If Canon used Sony sensors, or if Canon made a comparable sensor, I'd probably shoot with Canon. Lord knows there are many reasons to. But I'm not a very good photographer and need all the help I can get, so having a good sensor and the latitude it offers to save my butt sometimes really helps.
Canon does a lot right, which makes it number one.... (show quote)



Canon decided to continue using their own sensors because they were fully aware their would be a controlling monopoly if they bought from Sony. There is already plenty of talk where Sony had decided to only share some of their sensors and that leaves companies like Nikon a little on edge. It's rumored Nikon has been held back partially by this new condition from Sony.

Say as will but many times great pictures don't need great sensors. They need great photographers. Many award winning images have expressed excellence by lighting and composition and by limited dynamic range. People that are too hung up on tech and complain that hardware isn't good enough often can't take a picture if their life depended on it. My aged 5D III continues to outperform my abilities. Ansel Adams said it best,
“The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it.”

Sorry Cholly, didn't mean to derail your Sony advertisement.

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 13:25:32   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
Haydon wrote:
Say as will but many times great pictures don't need great sensors. They need great photographers. Many award winning images have expressed excellence by lighting and composition and by limited dynamic range. People that are too hung up on tech and complain that hardware isn't good enough often can't take a picture if their life depended on it. My aged 5D III continues to outperform my abilities. Ansel Adams said it best,
“The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it.”
Say as will but many times great pictures don't ne... (show quote)


I sense that the older one gets the more one is set in his or her ways, but this post should be made a sticky on UHH.

Excellent post!

Reply
 
 
Apr 21, 2017 13:31:19   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
Dalek wrote:
I cannot imagine a better image than the ones I get from my D810. If the camera was upgraded, it would have to have ground-breaking improvements. As far as action shots such as motocross or birds in flight I am TOTALLY satisfied with my current D5 and D500. As far as Nikon glass I have no complaints. If I was starting out today, I would really have to research the new Sony as related to my style of shooting. I am sure it is a good camera but at the price.. compared to a D500.... Hmm.


What in the world made you purchase a D5? I am sure it is a good camera but at the price.. compared to a D500....
Hmm.

Just kidding with you. The A9 is targeting the 2 pro cameras not the D500

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 14:00:01   #
bwana Loc: Bergen, Alberta, Canada
 
Erik_H wrote:
With Sony's announcement of the a9 and it's very impressive spec sheet I can't help but wonder if Nikon and Canon are ever going to respond with a serious mirrorless camera. The a9 looks to be aimed at pro, full frame shooters and I think it could really take a bite out of the DSLR market. While I have no plans to go mirrorless -hell, I still shoot film- I'd like to hear other's thoughts on the issue.

Definitely aimed at the Pro marketplace. The specs are impressive but I'll stick with my A7R II and A7S.

bwa

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 14:04:06   #
MW
 
My opinions:
-In five years or less mirrorless will dominate almost all the market niches held by Nikon and Canon.
-Full frame is going to be squeezed from both below (APS-C) and from above (4cm x 3cm such as Fuji GFX50).
-Entry level DSLR (sucks D3x00) will survive longer than expected because development costs are already spent and existing lenses are more than adequate while Fuji and Sony won't be able to reduce costs at the low end enough to be competitive for some time.
--Within the same five years the super expensive ($20-50k) medium format market is going to feel pressure from Fuji and the new Hasselblad mirrorless MF.

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 14:10:24   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
tdekany wrote:
What in the world made you purchase a D5? I am sure it is a good camera but at the price.. compared to a D500....
Hmm.

Just kidding with you. The A9 is targeting the 2 pro cameras not the D500


The A9 is not a truly pro camera because it lacks not one fast prime telephoto lens in the E mount. Advantage Nikon and Canon.

Reply
 
 
Apr 21, 2017 14:33:30   #
CHOLLY Loc: THE FLORIDA PANHANDLE!
 
Peterff wrote:
Yes, I know all of that, it is old news and not relevant.


ACTUALLY, it's as relevant as ANY discussion of Canon or Nikon history... ESPECIALLY when "Sony is new to this game" is mentioned in that context.

Sony is NOT new to this, as it totally absorbed a company that has been in the photography business since the 1920's.

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 14:37:09   #
CHOLLY Loc: THE FLORIDA PANHANDLE!
 
azted wrote:
I purchased a Sony F717 back in 1999 or so. The lens was Zeiss, and I got spoiled on IQ. So Peter, your 2006 comment was misinformed. What everyone else is missing here is that the same technology that makes the A9 so superior, has been brewing all along in the A7 and A6000 series cameras, even going back to the Nex-7. So marketing wise, the A9 is aimed at the pros, but everyone has and will benefit from the R&D that Sony has been investing in. That is top to bottom in the line, and the glass is following rapidly. There are now no "holes" in the offering! (Except for you non-translucent mirror addicts)
I purchased a Sony F717 back in 1999 or so. The le... (show quote)


EXACTLY!!!

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 14:42:06   #
Erik_H Loc: Denham Springs, Louisiana
 
CHOLLY wrote:
Those Nikon cameras you love ALL have Sony sensors in them.

EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM.

Love the images you get from your Nikons? Well, the company that developed the technology to help you GET those images is making some of the best cameras ever produced. The A9 is just the latest example.

Like your D5? Well, the A9 is half the weight, has higher resolution, better low light performance, a better AF tracking system, AF points that cover the entire field of view (93%), shoots at nearly TWICE the frame rate WITH full AF and AE but WITHOUT blackout, and it costs $2000 LESS.

There are a LOT of people who will be convinced by this...
Those Nikon cameras you love ALL have Sony sensors... (show quote)

Every single one? Nope. The sensors in the D2h, D3, D4, Df, and the D5 are made by Nikon. As well as the D3100, D3200, and D3300.

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 14:45:40   #
CHOLLY Loc: THE FLORIDA PANHANDLE!
 
Peterff wrote:
Cholly, you are not a professional research person. You come across as a shill for Sony. Do they pay you or are you just gullible?

Although there are many sources of information on the internet and some are dependable and some are not, the preponderance of information does not point towards Sony as being a significant pioneer, a contributor yes, but primarily from an analogue video perspective, just using digital recording of analogue signals. http://www.cnet.com/news/photos-the-history-of-the-digital-camera/ This is just one example.

If you wish to make a point of this, then you need to cite viable references. Other than that, you are welcome to your somewhat biased opinion, or to use alternative facts.
Cholly, you are not a professional research person... (show quote)


Actually Peter, I AM a professional research person. Got the degrees and work experience to prove it too.

Everyone here loves their gear; it's human nature. Because I am more enthusiastic that makes me a shill? Well, when I read what the other companies are offering, then listen to their consumers bad mouth SUPERIOR Sony products, what does that make them?

Oh... and if you want to split hairs about digital recordings of analogue signals, I go you one better; by that standard ALL DIGITAL CAMERAS DIGITALLY RECORD ANALOGUE SIGNALS.

Every single one of them.

Reply
 
 
Apr 21, 2017 14:48:37   #
bwana Loc: Bergen, Alberta, Canada
 
billnikon wrote:
The A9 is not a truly pro camera because it lacks not one fast prime telephoto lens in the E mount. Advantage Nikon and Canon.

Yes, but those nice Canon and Nikon lenses can be used quite nicely on E-mount cameras!

bwa

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 14:57:17   #
CHOLLY Loc: THE FLORIDA PANHANDLE!
 
Erik_H wrote:
Every single one? Nope. The sensors in the D2h, D3, D4, Df, and the D5 are made by Nikon. As well as the D3100, D3200, and D3300.


I'm sorry, and I do NOT mean to be disrespectful... but if you go back and read my post as well as the post it contained in quote form, you will see that what I typed is 100% correct.

Again, no disrespect intended Erik...

As for the D5, well; click on THIS LINK

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 14:58:41   #
CHOLLY Loc: THE FLORIDA PANHANDLE!
 
bwana wrote:
Yes, but those nice Canon and Nikon lenses can be used quite nicely on E-mount cameras!

bwa


VERY true.

Which is WHY so many canikon users are switching over to Sony........

Reply
Apr 21, 2017 15:21:49   #
BebuLamar
 
Peterff wrote:
Yes, I know all of that, it is old news and not relevant.


Not relevant because the inventor of digital photography went bankrupt due to digital photography.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.