Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Best travel camera for low light photos
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
Apr 20, 2017 13:52:53   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Haydon wrote:
When people on this forum refer to a travel camera (from my judgment they are looking for a lightweight package) with as few lenses as possible. Almost weekly you see people posting how their entry level DSLR is getting heavy and it's become the norm.

As it turns out I read it correctly and the OP wants something compact without bulk.

Gene you're an exception to most. You don't mind carrying gear and you aren't one who scrimps on quality right from the camera body, to the lens or the tripod and IQ is very important with you and generally speaking you don't compromise at that expense. When I travel I don't care about lightweight, I care about image quality.

It's only the hardcore that brings a full kit especially as we age or encounter health issues. I don't like to compromise either when I travel. I bring a full kit with a bad case of emphysema routinely. Compromises to me only bring dissatisfaction.

What's right for you or me isn't RIGHT for everybody. That's the most important thing to remember.
When people on this forum refer to a travel camera... (show quote)


You do realize that the smiley face meant I was pulling your leg, don't you?

I completely agree - with you - I am a bit of a whack-job, and OCD about IQ. But the other point I was making, using my own experience in a laughing way, is that a travel camera can vary in definition from a cellphone to a field and view camera. And yes, I used to travel with a 4x5 Anniversary Crown Graphic, until I "downsized" to a Horseman 985 (6x9 120 rollfilm).



Crazy me - last year I hiked 12 miles with a camera bag and tripod - that weighed about 40 lbs - just to photograph Alamere Falls in Sonoma, CA. My 27 yr old son, also an avid hiker, didn't believe how heavy my pack was. But i did get what I went for. Descending/ascending the crumbing rock to get a view of the lower falls was quite "interesting" with the pack on. Nothing like a handhold/foothold crumbling as you put your weight on it. Times Like those I wished I had an Oly. . . But when I printed these (and some others) I had no regrets having lugged my D800s.

Upper Alamere Falls
Upper Alamere Falls...
(Download)

Lower Alamere Falls
Lower Alamere Falls...
(Download)

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 14:03:48   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Fotoartist wrote:
IMO, you are missing the boat on picking a good traveling camera by placing too much emphasis on low light rather than compact size, zoom range, raw capabilities, etc.
I would be asking, what is a good compact point-n-shoot with a decent zoom range say 28-120, that shoots raw and has a moderate megapixel count that translates into less noisy images.


Maybe he explores caves and cities at night.

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 14:12:01   #
rtcary
 
I too am going on a trip for my grandson's graduation in Hawaii and then to visit our daughter in Italy, so I needed something easier to carry than my D810 and either my 24-70 f/2.8 or the 50 mm f/1.4. Nothing smaller can equal the 36 MB sensor, so I'm not going to try. All I want is something that will give me some images that will make good 8 X 10's. My choice: Panasonic LX100.

While visiting other children last week, that was the only camera I took and I'm quite happy. Yes, I wish it had more zoom and a 16 MP sensor, however it has many other offsetting features -- nothing is perfect.

Todd







Reply
 
 
Apr 20, 2017 14:28:55   #
Wes97068 Loc: Portland Oregon
 
For a camera that will fit in your trouser pocket with good light sensitivity take a look at the Sony RX 100 . I had the first version and loved it, still would have one if I did not have to replace it when I was traveling in South Africa and Sony had pulled out of that market. Believe it is now it its 5th or maybe even 6th edition.

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 14:49:35   #
SteveLew Loc: Sugar Land, TX
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPPMZyxMt-s&t=83s

Try the link above regarding the Fuji XT20 which is an outstanding travel camera that does well in low light. This camera came out in late February 2017 and is backordered. However, if you order now it should not take too long to get. This travel camera is about 8f5% of the flagship XT2 with the same sensor and speedy focusing.

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 15:34:00   #
caljr Loc: Indiana
 
I have the Fuji 18-55 lens I got with my Fuji XE1 and could just pick up the body. I like Fuji for a medium travel camera. I have got good results with my old XE1. Thanks to everyone for your opinions about travel cameras.

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 15:53:50   #
Deacon Pete Loc: New Jersey
 
You can get a used Fuji XE2 and the really good fuji xf27 2.8 pancake lens. Makes a great light weight kit and I have used it to take excellent low light images. You can push fuji to higher ISO without worrying

Reply
 
 
Apr 20, 2017 16:03:14   #
Patrick9 Loc: Muncie, IN
 
When I am thinking of a travel camera I usually want a camera that will fit in my pocket. The Ricoh GR II looks like a good choice. My personal travel camera is a Panasonic ZS-100. I have been very happy with it including shots at night.

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 16:14:01   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
rtcary wrote:
I too am going on a trip for my grandson's graduation in Hawaii and then to visit our daughter in Italy, so I needed something easier to carry than my D810 and either my 24-70 f/2.8 or the 50 mm f/1.4. Nothing smaller can equal the 36 MB sensor, so I'm not going to try. All I want is something that will give me some images that will make good 8 X 10's. My choice: Panasonic LX100.

While visiting other children last week, that was the only camera I took and I'm quite happy. Yes, I wish it had more zoom and a 16 MP sensor, however it has many other offsetting features -- nothing is perfect.

Todd
I too am going on a trip for my grandson's graduat... (show quote)


Nice shots.

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 16:15:03   #
DeanS Loc: Capital City area of North Carolina
 
CO wrote:
. What is the definition of a travel camera?


A camera you take when you travel.😎😎😎

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 16:21:05   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
DeanS wrote:
A camera you take when you travel.😎😎😎


A Graflex - with flash!

Reply
 
 
Apr 20, 2017 16:26:51   #
lmTrying Loc: WV Northern Panhandle
 
Sorry fo the delay, thunderstorms causing havoc with internet. According to info on Amazon, file format is JPEG (Exif v2.3). Records in L A2 16.5 x 23. .4 in, M1 A3-A5, M2 postcard, S email
Shoots in Manual,Av, TV, Program, LIVE, Auto, Sports, SCAN, Movie, +.
Hope this helps.

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 18:23:11   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
jerryc41 wrote:
A Graflex - with flash!


Now you're talkin'!

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 18:58:25   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
CO wrote:
The OP specified an APS-C sensor. Point and shoot cameras usually have smaller sensors. What is the definition of a travel camera?


I travel with a camera bag containing a D5, 24-70, 70-200, filters, spare batteries and cards. No tripod. And I sold my graflex many years ago.

I do not go on rollercoasters. Did that when I was 65 years younger.

Reply
Apr 20, 2017 21:07:41   #
therwol Loc: USA
 
SkyKing wrote:
...Sony rx 100...


Agree. My son in law just bought one of these things. It cost a grand, but try to find anything better in this size and weight. The only drawback I see is the 70mm equivalent focal length on the long end (and the convoluted menus.)

http://www.kenrockwell.com/sony/rx100-mk-v.htm

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.