Best travel camera for low light photos
Apr 20, 2017 08:35:14 #
Apr 20, 2017 08:39:06 #
caljr wrote:
I have a Fuji XE1 and like the camera but it has a hard time focusing in low light. I'm looking to upgrade to a camera for travel that will take nice low light photos and use APS-C-sensor? Any suggestion.
What lens did you use with your X-E1? If you have the 18-55 f2.8 - 4 then that's a great lens.
Not being funny, but you are aware that Fuji X-Series cameras have moved on in leaps and bounds since the early days of your X-E1?
No need to change makes, or go back to the size, weight etc of the D300 you were selling last year. Take a close look at the X-E2, the X-T2 and the X-T20. And the X-Pro 2 has a "cult" following. There's loads of info available. Just ask if you'd like to see some from "outside the USA" !
Apr 20, 2017 08:40:20 #
I think the obvious answer to your request is one of the Sony APS-C E-Mount cameras, the least expensive and lightest being the A6000. The A6300 is also good and the A6500 is weather sealed with touch screen but of course is more than twice the cost of the A6000. I would vote for the A6000 given your requirements and impedimentia. Enjoy!
Jim
Jim
Apr 20, 2017 09:06:22 #
berchman
Loc: South Central PA
I've successfully used my Fuji X-T2, shooting RAW only, for low light travel photography.
Apr 20, 2017 09:15:26 #
I looked long and hard for a low light camera/lens combination because most of my photos are taken without a flash to keep natural looking colors. I settled on a Panasonic Lumix GX7 mirrorless 4/3. It is light weight with the 1.7 pancake lens (no zoom), with which I shoot most pictures, but I also have a 14-140 zoom when I need it. It nearly doubles the weight and bulk though! After lugging heavy equipment most of my life, I feel free again and am happy with the results. Many who see the camera around my neck ask if I still use film! It has most of the bells and whistles, but looks like an older SLR.
Apr 20, 2017 09:20:44 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
caljr wrote:
I have a Fuji XE1 and like the camera but it has a hard time focusing in low light. I'm looking to upgrade to a camera for travel that will take nice low light photos and use APS-C-sensor? Any suggestion.
Any of the Sony RX100 series of camera's. My RX100 II has a HDR feature that allows the camera to combine up to 6 exposures for great low light photography. Produces two finished photos, one with more shadow detail than the other but both are acceptable. I have found this feature great for low light situations. Also does rear curtain flash for low light. You can also do manual exposure compensation and because you have an electronic viewfinder you can see the final shot before you take the shot.
Apr 20, 2017 09:20:59 #
craggycrossers wrote:
What lens did you use with your X-E1? If you have ... (show quote)
I was amazed at how many Fuji X Series cameras I saw when I went to Europe a few years ago.
Apr 20, 2017 09:55:24 #
I fly fish 100 - 120 days a year and carry an Olympus TG-4. I wanted it for low light, macro shots, and still fit in my shirt pocket. It's specs include f2.0 lens, 16 mp, an option to shot jpeg & raw files, and waterproof. In fact, I stick it underwater on purpose to get a fish pic on occasion.
I had a Konika 35 mm years ago I set on a rock while fishing only to turn around while I was playing a fish to see it drop into the water. I purchased a Nikon D7100 for times when water isn't an issue and I'm not holding my fly rod.
And no worries when water splashes on you and your camera during some of the rides!
You can see pictures from the Olympus on my RiverKeeper Flies website - www.johnkreft.com
John
I had a Konika 35 mm years ago I set on a rock while fishing only to turn around while I was playing a fish to see it drop into the water. I purchased a Nikon D7100 for times when water isn't an issue and I'm not holding my fly rod.
And no worries when water splashes on you and your camera during some of the rides!
You can see pictures from the Olympus on my RiverKeeper Flies website - www.johnkreft.com
John
Apr 20, 2017 10:19:31 #
smk124
Loc: Cheltenham, PA
My Sony a6000 and two lenses go with me everywhere and never put a dent on my shoulder.
Apr 20, 2017 11:02:32 #
Apr 20, 2017 11:03:15 #
IMO, you are missing the boat on picking a good traveling camera by placing too much emphasis on low light rather than compact size, zoom range, raw capabilities, etc.
I would be asking, what is a good compact point-n-shoot with a decent zoom range say 28-120, that shoots raw and has a moderate megapixel count that translates into less noisy images.
I would be asking, what is a good compact point-n-shoot with a decent zoom range say 28-120, that shoots raw and has a moderate megapixel count that translates into less noisy images.
Apr 20, 2017 11:04:14 #
Apr 20, 2017 11:06:40 #
Algernon
Loc: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Sony is known for their sensor technology. I am biased, but whole-heartedly would recommend the Sony A6300 or A6500.
Small. Lightweight. APS-C sensor. Interchangeable lenses. Good low-light performance.
Small. Lightweight. APS-C sensor. Interchangeable lenses. Good low-light performance.
Apr 20, 2017 11:25:48 #
Hello, Take a read up on the Leica Dlux 6. I use it when I have to travel the way that you describe, it is extremely compact, but takes some great shots. The lens is very high quality and so the quality of pics is in my mind very good. But search a few reviews on line, and you will see some really positive comments. I tend to keep the ISO low and reviews seem to say the same thing.
I often use the camera around town because it is so easy to have in my pocket, take shots and then come back with another camera, but often I catch the shots I want with that camera.
I often use the camera around town because it is so easy to have in my pocket, take shots and then come back with another camera, but often I catch the shots I want with that camera.
Apr 20, 2017 11:31:42 #
CO wrote:
The Nikon D5 and D500 have the best autofocus system that has ever been put in a DSLR camera. They are the first two Nikons to have a processor dedicated to just the autofocus system. They are rated to autofocus down to -4EV. I have a d500. It focuses in dim light very well.
You call the D5 a small little travel camera? Wow. Nikon has had processors dedicated to just the af for many years on many of their models, so have other camera makers (by now its a normal thing)!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.