US Supreme Court To Rule On Lexmark vs Impression Products (ink jet cartridges)
Mar 27, 2017 00:48:01 #
Mar 27, 2017 03:21:27 #
Mar 27, 2017 03:48:40 #
I've also gone to monochromatic printing to save on printing costs. Why use color printer ink when just printing text?
Mar 27, 2017 08:31:12 #
I personally only buy OEM carts for my laser printer but I do refill my own for my Pixma Pro 100 and I also purchase 3rd party empty cartridges for refill as well. I wonder how that will effect home refill buff's like me? If they are not carful how they rule on this one it could cost the consumer a lot of money and heartburn.
Mar 27, 2017 09:57:58 #
WayneT wrote:
I personally only buy OEM carts for my laser printer but I do refill my own for my Pixma Pro 100 and I also purchase 3rd party empty cartridges for refill as well. I wonder how that will effect home refill buff's like me? If they are not carful how they rule on this one it could cost the consumer a lot of money and heartburn.
Imagine what would have happened 30 years ago if SCOTUS has ruled against digital re-duplication of music and movies, etc. The world as we know it would have been entirely different.
Mar 28, 2017 08:09:51 #
If Lexmark wins say goodbye to used cameras, cars and boats too.
Mar 28, 2017 15:54:45 #
alby
Loc: very eastern pa.
watch out ....with what our country is in for, this may be one small hickup.
Mar 28, 2017 21:52:06 #
How about the 'Polaroid Method?' Invent a camera & film system, patent it so no one else can make film for the camera, or a camera for the film. Then, a few yrs later, bring out a 'new & improved' camera & film system. Repeat the process. Ca early to mid 50's - roll b & w film & cameras, 60's - color & b & w pack film & cameras, 70's SX-70 'instant' film & cameras, 80's - Spectra. . . and minor variations along the way.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.