boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
For those of you who slammed Trump for claiming that he was "Tapped" Google- Project Dragnet
"Godlike Productions"?
Remember Trump"s "Birther " conspiracy facts?
boberic wrote:
For those of you who slammed Trump for claiming that he was "Tapped" Google- Project Dragnet
Does it give indisputable hard proof of the wiretap?
Is it just a Breitbarf clone?
I'll wait till PUTOS TWEETS THE PROOF!!! The only reliable info out there!!!
SS
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
SharpShooter wrote:
Does it give indisputable hard proof of the wiretap?
Is it just a Breitbarf clone?
I'll wait till PUTOS TWEETS THE PROOF!!! The only reliable info out there!!!
SS
It lists NSA documents. Further down there is even a NY times article listed
Keenan
Loc: Central Coast California
boberic wrote:
It lists NSA documents. Further down there is even a NY times article listed
Hey Bob, documents that discuss the NSA wiretapping folks in general are not evidence that Obama ordered a wire tap of Trump. Do you not understand the difference?
Keenan
Loc: Central Coast California
boberic wrote:
It lists NSA documents. Further down there is even a NY times article listed
the only google results that come up are links to fake news sites: Infowars, WingNutDaily, Drudge, Godlike Productions, and other right wing fringe conspiracy sites. Not even Fox News. Some day, Bob, You need to have somebody explain to you the difference between fake news sites and real news. I've tried to point this out to you before that these sites are not sources for credible evidence, and you have made a fool of yourself every time you relied on these fake news sites, only to be made a fool of over and over again as these fake stories you believed turned out fake. But for some reason you just can't stop going back to these same fake news sources no matter how many times they have lied to you and made a fool out of you. This indicates that your critical thinking ability is severely impaired, and you consistently put belief in your right wing extremist ideology above objective truth. You will believe whatever fits your narrative, regardless of the truth or falseness of it.
The NYT article says nothing about anyone ordering a wire tap of Trump, nor about Obama ordering a wire tap of anyone. Presidents are not allowed to do stuff like this. It would be unconstitutional. When Trump brought up the NYT article in his media interview the other day, it was an unbelievably idiotic stunt, because the NYT article discussed NSA wiretaps in general, and had nothing to do with Trumps bullshit Obama conspiracy theory. Can you really not understand the difference, and why the NYT article was not any kind of evidence for Trump's bogus Obama claim? I thought I already explained this to you yesterday?
Keenan wrote:
the only google results that come up are links to fake news sites: Infowars, WingNutDaily, Drudge, Godlike Productions, and other right wing fringe conspiracy sites. Not even Fox News. Some day, Bob, You need to have somebody explain to you the difference between fake news sites and real news. I've tried to point this out to you before that these sites are not sources for credible evidence, and you have made a fool of yourself every time you relied on these fake news sites, only to be made a fool of over and over again as these fake stories you believed turned out fake. But for some reason you just can't stop going back to these same fake news sources no matter how many times they have lied to you and made a fool out of you. This indicates that your critical thinking ability is severely impaired, and you consistently put belief in your right wing extremist ideology above objective truth. You will believe whatever fits your narrative, regardless of the truth or falseness of it.
The NYT article says nothing about anyone ordering a wire tap of Trump, nor about Obama ordering a wire tap of anyone. Presidents are not allowed to do stuff like this. It would be unconstitutional. When Trump brought up the NYT article in his media interview the other day, it was an unbelievably idiotic stunt, because the NYT article discussed NSA wiretaps in general, and had nothing to do with Trumps bullshit Obama conspiracy theory. Can you really not understand the difference, and why the NYT article was not any kind of evidence for Trump's bogus Obama claim? I thought I already explained this to you yesterday?
the only google results that come up are links to ... (
show quote)
Happened on obama's administration you stupid fairy so he is responsible. Why don't you get yourself a job fairy boy?
FlyingTiger wrote:
Happened on obama's administration you stupid fairy so he is responsible. Why don't you get yourself a job fairy boy?
I understand that you hold Obama responsible for EVERYTHING that happened while he was President.
I only hope that you hold Trump to the same standard.
chrisscholbe wrote:
I understand that you hold Obama responsible for EVERYTHING that happened while he was President.
I only hope that you hold Trump to the same standard.
Less and Less right wing folks try to defend Trump with each lie. Have you noticed the brighter conservatives have quit trying to defend the indefensible? We still have a few Trolls who come on and name call but can't win any debate with facts. The sad part is the Office of POTUS has lost respect around the World with the lying Idiot that now holds it :(
green
Loc: 22.1749611,-159.646704,20
FlyingTiger wrote:
Happened on obama's administration you stupid fairy so he is responsible. Why don't you get yourself a job fairy boy?
ironic much?
pussy flying high on pixie dust
This type of post really doesn't help anyone's argument.
It only takes, what I always hope will be, a serious discussion onto a name calling thread.
Keenan
Loc: Central Coast California
chrisscholbe wrote:
This type of post really doesn't help anyone's argument.
It only takes, what I always hope will be, a serious discussion onto a name calling thread.
Seriously? You think green's relatively mild but appropriate response to the vulgar FlyingPussy troll's name calling post takes this discussion into name calling??? Perhaps you missed the post that green was responding to?
In case you missed it, the post green was responding to already took the discussion into vulgar name calling with "stupid fairy" and "get yourself a job fairy boy." Please tell me how calling me "stupid fairy" and "get yourself a job fairy boy" has anything to do with serious discussion?
By the way, have you noticed that FlyingPussy regularly calls me "faggot" and other vulgar and childish insults, and has NEVER contributed any civil or serious discussion? How did you miss that?
Keenan wrote:
Hey Bob, documents that discuss the NSA wiretapping folks in general are not evidence that Obama ordered a wire tap of Trump. Do you not understand the difference?
KKKeenan KKKover up time. Real Americans know the POS Obama and his sycophants were behind it. Keep playing little man, your still losing.
Keenan wrote:
the only google results that come up are links to fake news sites: Infowars, WingNutDaily, Drudge, Godlike Productions, and other right wing fringe conspiracy sites. Not even Fox News. Some day, Bob, You need to have somebody explain to you the difference between fake news sites and real news. I've tried to point this out to you before that these sites are not sources for credible evidence, and you have made a fool of yourself every time you relied on these fake news sites, only to be made a fool of over and over again as these fake stories you believed turned out fake. But for some reason you just can't stop going back to these same fake news sources no matter how many times they have lied to you and made a fool out of you. This indicates that your critical thinking ability is severely impaired, and you consistently put belief in your right wing extremist ideology above objective truth. You will believe whatever fits your narrative, regardless of the truth or falseness of it.
The NYT article says nothing about anyone ordering a wire tap of Trump, nor about Obama ordering a wire tap of anyone. Presidents are not allowed to do stuff like this. It would be unconstitutional. When Trump brought up the NYT article in his media interview the other day, it was an unbelievably idiotic stunt, because the NYT article discussed NSA wiretaps in general, and had nothing to do with Trumps bullshit Obama conspiracy theory. Can you really not understand the difference, and why the NYT article was not any kind of evidence for Trump's bogus Obama claim? I thought I already explained this to you yesterday?
the only google results that come up are links to ... (
show quote)
KKKover up KKKeenan still trying to defend the indefensible POS Obama. Just can't stand to have your scrawny ass kicked time and time again. KKKeep playing little man, we're winning.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.