Via the Lens, Great pictures, I like #2 the best.
The moon is relatively easy since it's in normal "daylight" and takes a normal exposure. It suggests some sort of tripod although handheld is possible. This exposure of 1/50 f/5.9 iso=80 is relatively simple, but fl=630mm is a little delicate and favored using a tripod.
WayneW wrote:
Karen's right. Moonlight is reflected sunlight. Spot metering with my (ancient) D200 and Nikon 80-200 D 2.8 resulted in overexposing the moon. Still have to compensate by less exposure.
The moon shot was taken recently, but the landscape(moonscape) was a long time ago. The landscape shot below was taken at night with a full moon. Shutter speed was between 4 and 5 minutes, aperture was probably f4, FILM was probably Fuji Reala 100.
https://flic.kr/p/S3E9m6https://flic.kr/p/amkF1YI'm still learning, but did you really mean 4 or 5 minutes?
I under expose the exposure, seems to work for me, but then again, I'm not a pro. Just a few shots from 01/30 and 31. I used Canon EOS 1DX with a Canon 100mm to 400mm with a 2X extender on a tripod. First two were hand held.
The moon is lit by the sun and is like full daylight shooting. Start with the Sunny 16 Rule. An exception would be a full moon seen at dusk or dawn. Then metering would be a place to start and you could hope to get decent exposure for vegetation or buildings.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.