Did not view all of them -- But what I saw did not look bad at all -- Photo 2/15 is in my for sure non-professional opinion a damn fine photo --- Wish I had taken it
That's the problem with photo contests. You end up with what the judge likes. Now, as to the picture they chose here, it's not a bad picture. Is it good enough to win a National Geographic photo contest? Evidently the judge(s) thought so.
Well my "assumption" with this NG contest is that these are photos submitted & taken by folks that subscribe to this specific NG's publication --- We at our house get it --- now their my be a ringer or two sprinkled in --- But for the most part the majority of the photos are probably from folks that do not now or ever aspire to make their living with a camera --- I have been on a number of NG travel tours to various parts of the world --- The overwhelming number of photos taken on these trips were taken with cell phones --- With me taking shots with my Canon 5DII -- Well now --- That made me the one eyed man in the land of the blind --- I of course did not enter any of my stuff in any of NG Trip contests -- But I did end up supplying most of my fellow travelers with good enough usable photos --- Still wish I had taken 2/15 --I would make a nice big print of it & hang it on a wall
I have filed NG as Child Abuse Mag. But I guess in today's Anything goes , ma be you can post your children
on the cover soon as you convince them what sex or animal they are sick Rag.
Duggy wrote:
I have filed NG as Child Abuse Mag. But I guess in today's Anything goes , ma be you can post your children
on the cover soon as you convince them what sex or animal they are sick Rag.
What in the hell are you talking about!!!!! My God man GET A GRIP --- It's only a Travel Magazine -- And a rather interesting one at that -- Go find your Demons somewhere else ------
werg
Loc: Sunnyvale, Ca
agree with Ken Stern on BOTH posts
For the most part I thought the photos were really good. NG has always been one of my favorite magazines.
Well I don't see any real issue with any of the images. I saw several I wish I had taken or had the opportunity to visit the location to shoot my own pic.
KenBlackwell wrote:
Well I don't see any real issue with any of the images. I saw several I wish I had taken or had the opportunity to visit the location to shoot my own pic.
I would imagine that life as a NG photographer is pretty nice.
ricardo7
Loc: Washington, DC - Santiago, Chile
About what I'd expect from NG. Nice, generally pretty, easy to look at, safe pictures.
Not taking any chances, don't want to offend anyone kind of pictures.
ken_stern wrote:
What in the hell are you talking about!!!!! My God man GET A GRIP --- It's only a Travel Magazine -- And a rather interesting one at that -- Go find your Demons somewhere else ------
I guess you thought the Little boy with pink hair and dressed like a girl is your thing is it your thing ?
That child so young will be confused for life, I thought N G was a good mag until they decided to cram gender identity down my throat . Jan 2017 issue Cover. They should stick to travel not child abuse. They lost a lot of sales that is from people with a mind/
Duggy wrote:
I guess you thought the Little boy with pink hair and dressed like a girl is your thing is it your thing ?
That child so young will be confused for life, I thought N G was a good mag until they decided to cram gender identity down my throat . Jan 2017 issue Cover. They should stick to travel not child abuse. They lost a lot of sales that is from people with a mind/
Are you talking about photo #3/15
The photo Titled: "Woman dressed to celebrate Mexico's Day of the Dead??
Is that what you find Sooooooo damn Offensive??
Because if it is ---
Then where ever in the hell you live - & - I must say I'm darn sorry for your neighbors
Fellow you just need to get out more --
A whole LOT MORE
ricardo7
Loc: Washington, DC - Santiago, Chile
ken_stern wrote:
Are you talking about photo #3/15
The photo Titled: "Woman dressed to celebrate Mexico's Day of the Dead??
Is that what you find Sooooooo damn Offensive??
Because if it is ---
Then where ever in the hell you live - & - I must say I'm darn sorry for your neighbors
Fellow you just need to get out more --
A whole LOT MORE
This is what he is talking about: I am only reporting the link. I am making no judgement.
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/01/editors-note-gender/
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.