Ugly Hedgehog® - Photography Forum
Home | Photography Digest | Active Topics | Search | Login | Register | Help
Canon vs Nikon: Which is better?
One camera setting that ruins your pictures
(and more, keep reading):
 

Among our users, we have some of the most talented photographers in the world share advice that you won't find even in the most expensive subscription magazines. That's because some of them only post on our website, so you won't find this information anywhere else! Some of them post under an alias, others disclose their studio name, it's up to them. But in either case you get to read and discover photography techniques that will make you very good at taking pictures.

Unlike other websites, we don't try to pitch DSLRs, lenses, and other gear, while collecting sales commission. We don't sell photography tutorials, books, DVDs and courses, while promising that your photography will improve only if you buy what's being promoted.

Instead, we have other people, who are either professional photographers or serious amateurs, some with decades of experience, share with you what they learned, what gear they use, which products really work and which are useless, which techniques work and which don't.

It's all completely unbiased. Our users simply have no reason to lie to you. They are people just like you.

And we provide a free platform for you and them to communicate. So you get to discover this information straight from the source, from people just like you, not from editors of some magazine or sales reps of some company.

This is what makes us different from other photography websites out there that try to sell you something while claiming they are trying to help you.

If you are a beginner, intermediate, advanced, or a professional photographer, then the benefits of signing up for our free daily photography forum digest are:

• We cover both film and digital photography.

• We talk about professional (D)SLR cameras, mirrorless cameras, mid-range/prosumer models, point-and-shoot, and camera phones.

• We cover all types of photography from portraits to landscapes to action shots to macro photography. (Which one interests you the most? Stop and ask yourself right now. You'll need to be able to answer that in just a minute. No matter what you shoot, you'll get better at just that. Read below to find out why.)

• We cover all aspects of photography from picking gear to composition to working with models, and everything in between.

• Each week you'll be receiving new tips and techniques on how to take the kind of pictures that will make your friends, relatives and peers just stare in amazement, speechless, when they see your work. Yep! That's how good your photography will become.

• Daily, you'll be receiving a photography forum digest with the latest photography tips, tricks, reviews and discussions.

• If you ever have a question or need help, you can always ask, and we'll cover your question in the following newsletter issue.

• And of course, it's all completely FREE!

• Let me repeat that. Since for some reason a lot of people contact us asking if the membership is really free: we are a social website for photographers, so we don't sell anything, and we don't charge any fees. It's as simple as that.

Here is how to proceed and what to expect:

Enter your name and e-mail address below, and you'll be instantly added to our photography mailing list distribution. You'll receive a one-time confirmation e-mail. Right after that, the first e-mail with today's digest will be forwarded to you. The signup process is completely automated, so you are just a few minutes away from discovering what our existing users already received earlier today. You'll get up to speed right away on what's the latest on our website, without any long introductions or other delays.

First name:

E-mail address:

Going forward, the next digest will be released in just a few hours. So if you don't sign up now, you'll also miss everything covered in it too.

 
Photo Analysis
Playing with a D500
If you would like to post a reply, then please login (if you already have an account) or register (if you don't).
Page: 1 2 next>>
Dec 5, 2016 19:18:02   #
Rongnongno (a regular here)
 
Do not expect perfection here. I just used this dreary day to experiment, hand held, very low speed at times 1/2s.

First I went onto the P mode , ISO static.
Driveway

Histogram is normal since there is no real highlight other than the grey clouds.


(Download)
With ACR corrections
With ACR corrections...
(Download)
 
Dec 5, 2016 19:19:20   #
Rongnongno (a regular here)
 
Now the sky....

Check out the histogram...


(Download)
Dec 5, 2016 19:22:04   #
Rongnongno (a regular here)
 
Tree line, priority to the sky...


(Download)
With ACR corrections
With ACR corrections...
(Download)
Dec 5, 2016 19:29:50   #
Rongnongno (a regular here)
 
Mixed tree sky

Notice that the histograms are similar to the previous set.


(Download)


(Download)
Dec 5, 2016 19:30:50   #
Rongnongno (a regular here)
 
And now the real experiment...

After I process these files too....
Dec 5, 2016 19:36:52   #
Rongnongno (a regular here)
 
Fence auto (last P mode)


(Download)


(Download)
 
Dec 5, 2016 19:43:38   #
Rongnongno (a regular here)
 
Fence... Manual Way under exposed (invariant)

Note that I am using a sledge hammer (ACR) and not taking the time to adjust as it should be.
Under exposure is -4.0
Under exposure is -4.0...
(Download)


(Download)
Dec 5, 2016 19:50:24   #
Rongnongno (a regular here)
 
Fence... ETTR

Note that I am using a sledge hammer (ACR) and not taking the time to adjust as it should be.

When using ETTR I routinely underexpose the 'default' I explained why somewhere else... The real exposure is +3 corrected as -2


(Download)


(Download)
Dec 5, 2016 19:52:23   #
Rongnongno (a regular here)
 
Someone can do other much more accurate tests but this does show, even imperfectly, the quality of this camera.

Ok, used about one hour now, what about the next 6 this day still has???
Dec 6, 2016 05:38:47   #
Rongnongno (a regular here)
 
What is in the sky anyway???


(Download)
Dec 6, 2016 13:18:39   #
R.G. (a regular here)
 
So what are your conclusions? To me it shows that the camera doesn't struggle to capture detail. It also did a good job of capturing the nearly white sky and the nearly black shadows in the tree/sky shot. It looks like it delivers data-rich files that can take a lot of pushing and pulling. It's hard to evaluate the noise performance from the posted images.
 
Dec 6, 2016 16:36:04   #
Rongnongno (a regular here)
 
R.G. wrote:
So what are your conclusions?.../...

Just one: This camera is definitively a keeper.

As to hope... I hope the next D8xx will be from the same vein then... I'll upgrade in a flash from D800e.

If you want the NEF (raw) files, let me know I'll post them on a different site so that you can do your own test on them (ETTR and under exposed).
Dec 8, 2016 00:37:51   #
R.G. (a regular here)
 
Rongnongno wrote:
Just one: This camera is definitively a keeper.

As to hope... I hope the next D8xx will be from the same vein then... I'll upgrade in a flash from D800e.

If you want the NEF (raw) files, let me know I'll post them on a different site so that you can do your own test on them (ETTR and under exposed).


Thanks for the offer. The reports and tests that I've read have convinced me already.
Dec 22, 2016 11:40:09   #
cheineck (a regular here)
 
Lots of work and time here. Thanks!!!
Dec 22, 2016 12:20:32   #
R.G. (a regular here)
 
Rongnongno wrote:
.......I hope the next D8xx will be from the same vein .....


That'd be the D5 then, unless the drop in resolution is a deal-breaker for you.
Page: 1 2 next>>
          
Photo Analysis
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2016 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.