Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
Munson falls in Tillamook, Oregon. sky blown out.
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Feb 7, 2015 19:24:25   #
turtlepond Loc: Long Beach, Calif
 
A friend and I went out to shoot Munson falls. It was a cloudy day and we were facing ESE. The sky is so blown out. I tried shooting playing with my settings. The sky seemed to be blown out no matter what I did. Any ideas? Maybe shooting later in the day. These were shot around 11:00am.. This falls does not get the sun this time of year. The photos do not do the falls justice... My friend also said that his photos didn't come out very good. We are both using canons. I tried shooting from different spots also.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

bottom of falls.
bottom of falls....
(Download)

Reply
Feb 7, 2015 22:13:02   #
SonyA580 Loc: FL in the winter & MN in the summer
 
Well, you could always add clouds in post processing if you have a program and the skills to do it. Or, you could crop out most of the sky to make it less noticeable. Otherwise, you are stuck with a flat sky that exposure changes will not bring out.

Reply
Feb 8, 2015 00:11:37   #
wisner Loc: The planet Twylo
 
In film photography, we called that 'the bald white sky'. No amount of post processing is going to save your image. Several ideas come to mind for the future: wait for better conditions(time of year, day, weather,etc.), bracketing your exposures for use kin an HDR program, or looking for subjects that do not include the sky. The bottom of falls is good.
Keep shooting!

Reply
 
 
Feb 8, 2015 06:03:15   #
Jackaroo Loc: Canberra Australia
 
Expose to right will help

Reply
Feb 8, 2015 06:09:18   #
mariraju Loc: Toronto
 
As wisner says, you can try one of those. Wait for different time of the day or month or year, assuming that you get good lighting for the falls. Anytime you feel like the sky is blown out, it is best not to include that as part of the composition and still keep the photograph interesting.
Some ideas that you can try,
You can take at least 3 photos with different exposure and use the same to create an HDR image.
You could try using CPL (polarizer)filter.
You could try using graduated ND (neutral density)filter, which will give exactly the result you are expecting for this situation.

In the above photos, I am assuming that the camera is in either spot or center weighted metering mode. I think it would have been little darker (especially the bottom part), if it would have been Matrix metering.
Please also try different modes and let us know if you have any further questions.

Reply
Feb 8, 2015 07:22:39   #
joehel2 Loc: Cherry Hill, NJ
 
Absent using a graduated neutral density filter on the lens or in post processing, cropping most of the sky out of the frame produces a very nice photo in your examples. Love the bottom of the falls shot.

Reply
Feb 8, 2015 10:15:01   #
Dave R. Loc: PNW
 
Get Bryon Petersons book Understanding Exposure 3rd edition. It includes some of the tips suggested so far and many more.

Reply
 
 
Feb 8, 2015 10:55:09   #
Madman Loc: Gulf Coast, Florida USA
 
Using my Nikon software, I would darken the entire image and then the shadow control to lighten the darker areas.

Reply
Feb 8, 2015 12:23:44   #
Ransch Loc: O'Fallon MO
 
I like doing what Sony580 suggests in adding clouds. On the other hand, I thought that the total absence of sky features caused me to pay more attention to the main feature of your shot, the scenery of the falls, which I thought was beautifully subdued.

Reply
Feb 8, 2015 12:28:46   #
llindstrand Loc: Seattle Metro
 
turtlepond wrote:
A friend and I went out to shoot Munson falls. It was a cloudy day and we were facing ESE. The sky is so blown out. I tried shooting playing with my settings. The sky seemed to be blown out no matter what I did. Any ideas? Maybe shooting later in the day. These were shot around 11:00am.. This falls does not get the sun this time of year. The photos do not do the falls justice... My friend also said that his photos didn't come out very good. We are both using canons. I tried shooting from different spots also.
A friend and I went out to shoot Munson falls. It ... (show quote)


I shoot with the same constraints as you with grey dull skies. I shoot in HDR which helps considerably. In some cases I substitute a different sky in PP such as OneOne Perfect Photo Suite. This works reasonably well if there is not too much fine detail in the sky area. However in your case with all the fine branches etc it removes some of that, thus it is not a good solution.

You might want to look at the last entry on this digest. HDR processing before and after. There are three sets of images that show both HDR and changing of background.
Swede

Reply
Feb 8, 2015 13:21:57   #
cactuspic Loc: Dallas, TX
 
If it's one of those gray, gray coastal Oregon days, try eliminating as much sky as possible or coming back when there is a better sky. Also I find the heavy blue cast in the shade dulls the greens down and takes the sparkle out of the falls. Correcting the color cast in the shade portions would add life and punch. Also the scene look like it could use a bit of clarity +/or contrast.

Reply
 
 
Feb 8, 2015 14:41:29   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
turtlepond wrote:
A friend and I went out to shoot Munson falls. It was a cloudy day and we were facing ESE. The sky is so blown out. I tried shooting playing with my settings. The sky seemed to be blown out no matter what I did. Any ideas? Maybe shooting later in the day. These were shot around 11:00am.. This falls does not get the sun this time of year. The photos do not do the falls justice... My friend also said that his photos didn't come out very good. We are both using canons. I tried shooting from different spots also.
A friend and I went out to shoot Munson falls. It ... (show quote)


My first thought, yes, that is a difficult range of light. The question I'd ask is did you photograph in RAW?
--Bob

Reply
Feb 8, 2015 16:47:28   #
Meives Loc: FORT LAUDERDALE
 
[quote=turtlepond] Others will advise you better, but I think an ISO of 2000 is a bit hight. David



Reply
Feb 8, 2015 16:56:22   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
[quote=Meives]
turtlepond wrote:
Others will advise you better, but I think an ISO of 2000 is a bit hight. David


I didn't stop to think about viewing the exif data. You're absolutely correct. ISO 2000 is way to high.
--Bob

Reply
Feb 8, 2015 17:27:47   #
turtlepond Loc: Long Beach, Calif
 
I didn't think of bracketing/hdr.. great idea.. thank you Mariraja
mariraju wrote:
As wisner says, you can try one of those. Wait for different time of the day or month or year, assuming that you get good lighting for the falls. Anytime you feel like the sky is blown out, it is best not to include that as part of the composition and still keep the photograph interesting.
Some ideas that you can try,
You can take at least 3 photos with different exposure and use the same to create an HDR image.
You could try using CPL (polarizer)filter.
You could try using graduated ND (neutral density)filter, which will give exactly the result you are expecting for this situation.

In the above photos, I am assuming that the camera is in either spot or center weighted metering mode. I think it would have been little darker (especially the bottom part), if it would have been Matrix metering.
Please also try different modes and let us know if you have any further questions.
As wisner says, you can try one of those. Wait for... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.