The Bunk House (Page 2): Ok, so it was off, but not by all that much. I feel better now.

ebrunner Loc: New Jersey Shore

Bob Yankle wrote:

ebrunner, you had me going there as whether or not... (show quote)

Ok, so it was off, but not by all that much. I feel better now.

Wahawk Loc: NE IA

Cotondog wrote:

Thanks for the comment, Bob. Actually, I looked at that horizon for quite a long time. I even straightened it, and then went back to the original. I believe it does seem a bit off-level, but that may be due to the hilly fields in the background, particularly on the right side of the photo. I know it's not so noticeable in the shot (the hills, I mean, as the hills do not get too big in Southern Saskatchewan).
But again, thank you for your comment.

On the hills, run-down bunkhouse, etc, I think it looks correct, wouldn't change the horizon at all.

Wahawk Loc: NE IA

OOPS! Lost connection/double post.... sorry!

Cotondog Loc: Saskatchewan, Canada

Wahawk wrote:

On the hills, run-down bunkhouse, etc, I think it looks correct, wouldn't change the horizon at all.

Thanks Wahawk.

cur Loc: rochester ny

The horizon doesn't bother me. I know I know it's not technically correct but the pictures is great. The roof shingles weathered different there are I believe only two panes of glass on this side of the building. The siding is weathered but not so much under the eaves. and the light tan weeds offset the buildings grays wonderfully.

Cotondog Loc: Saskatchewan, Canada

cur wrote:

The horizon doesn't bother me. I know I know it's not technically correct but the pictures is great. The roof shingles weathered different there are I believe only two panes of glass on this side of the building. The siding is weathered but not so much under the eaves. and the light tan weeds offset the buildings grays wonderfully.

Thank you, cur, for your very kind comments. Much appreciated!

Carolina Wings Loc: Flew from North Carolina to Pennsylvania

Cotondog wrote:

At least that is what the lady told me. She said her grandfather used to have a cattle ranch spread across this whole section of land back in the 1920s. The family let it turn to dust 40 years ago.

Canon 50D 18-55 @ 55mm ISO 400
F14 ss: 1/250

Thanks for looking. C & C welcome and appreciated.

Nice shot Cotondog :thumbup:

Cotondog Loc: Saskatchewan, Canada

Carolina Wings wrote:

Nice shot Cotondog :thumbup:

Thank you very much, Carolina Wings.

dragonswing Loc: Pa

Great shot! I love old buildings.

wilikioti Loc: Deep South, USA

Cotondog wrote:

At least that is what the lady told me. She said her grandfather used to have a cattle ranch spread across this whole section of land back in the 1920s. The family let it turn to dust 40 years ago.

Canon 50D 18-55 @ 55mm ISO 400
F14 ss: 1/250

Thanks for looking. C & C welcome and appreciated.

Very nice picture!! The horizon looks fine to me. :thumbup: :thumbup:

Cotondog Loc: Saskatchewan, Canada

dragonswing wrote:

Great shot! I love old buildings.

Thanks for the nice comment, dragonswing. I have a hard time passing by an old building without taking a picture of it.

Cotondog Loc: Saskatchewan, Canada

wilikioti wrote:

Very nice picture!! The horizon looks fine to me. :thumbup: :thumbup:

Thanks, wilikioti. Appreciate the comment.

Meives Loc: FORT LAUDERDALE

[quote=Cotondog]Time to end the controversy. One way to fix it.
David

Wahawk Loc: NE IA

[quote=Meives]

Cotondog wrote:

Time to end the controversy. One way to fix it.
David

Original needed NO correction, and it is AGAINST the FORUM RULES to do anything to the OP's pictures and repost UNLESS THEY ASK FOR IT!!!!