Ugly Hedgehog® - Photography Forum
Home | Photography Digest | Active Topics | Search | Login | Register | Help
Canon vs Nikon: Which is better?
Here is the truth one of them doesn't want you to know
(and more, keep reading):
 

If you are a beginner, intermediate, advanced, or a professional photographer, then the benefits of signing up for our free daily photography forum digest are:

• We cover both film and digital photography.

• We talk about professional (D)SLR cameras, mirrorless cameras, mid-range/prosumer models, point-and-shoot, and camera phones.

• We cover all types of photography from portraits to landscapes to action shots to macro photography. (Which one interests you the most? Stop and ask yourself right now. You'll need to be able to answer that in just a minute. No matter what you shoot, you'll get better at just that. Read below to find out why.)

• We cover all aspects of photography from picking gear to composition to working with models, and everything in between.

• Each week you'll be receiving new tips and techniques on how to take the kind of pictures that will make your friends, relatives and peers just stare in amazement, speechless, when they see your work. Yep! That's how good your photography will become.

• Daily, you'll be receiving a photography forum digest with the latest photography tips, tricks, reviews and discussions.

• If you ever have a question or need help, you can always ask, and we'll cover your question in the following newsletter issue.

• And of course, it's all completely FREE!

• Let me repeat that. Since for some reason a lot of people contact us asking if the membership is really free: we are a social website for photographers, so we don't sell anything, and we don't charge any fees. It's as simple as that.

Enter your name and e-mail address below, and you'll be instantly added to our photography mailing list distribution. Right away, you'll get access to more photography-related material (pictures, tips, tricks, reviews) than contained in all photography books and magazines you could ever buy. And you'll get all that for free.

Don't delay! Join the best photography community on the Internet.

First name:

E-mail address:

It's FREE, and you'll receive my first e-mail right away. Also, you'll get instant access to the most recent topics on our photography forum: hundreds of great tips from other photographers.

(A new newsletter issue is released each week. So if you don't sign up now, you'll miss this week's digest.)

 
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Another instance of questionable police action
If you would like to post a reply, then please login (if you already have an account) or register (if you don't).
Page: 1 2 3 4 next>>
Jul 9, 2013 08:44:13   #
SpeedyWilson
 
This is video captured by a driver stopped at a drunk driving checkpoint:

http://wtvr.com/2013/07/05/dui-checkpoint-video/

Because his window was not down far enough he was subjected to further search and delay.

Yes, compared to other events, this one is minor. But, it is worth watching, and thinking about what you might do in a similar circumstance.

I was once stopped for some reason that seemed odd to me. However, as the strange actions by one policeman continued another cop car appeared and an apparently more senior policeman put a stop to the whole thing immediately, and sent me on my way.
 
Jul 9, 2013 09:11:13   #
EdJ0307 (a regular here)
 
Only watched the first 30 or so seconds but looked like to me the dumb-ass kid just wanted to start something so his video would go viral on youtube. Checked the youtube and it has over 3 million hits. Accomplished his goal. Good job.
Jul 9, 2013 09:23:55   #
SpeedyWilson
 
You can't get the whole story in 30 seconds of a six minute video.
Jul 9, 2013 10:40:07   #
EdJ0307 (a regular here)
 
MisterWilson wrote:
You can't get the whole story in 30 seconds of a six minute video.

I got as much of the story as I wanted - 21 year-olds can be punks, cops can be a**holes. A number of the youtube commenters thought the kid was being a jerk.
Jul 9, 2013 12:33:02   #
Country's Mama
 
I think the kid was pushing a bit, but maybe to prove a point. The cops look like they were out to prove a point also. At no point was the kid disrespectful of the cops, though rolling his window down all the way would have avoided the whole thing. Even the cop that was searching the car knew the kid hasn't done anything wrong and said as much.
Jul 9, 2013 12:50:12   #
TrainNut
 
EdJ0307 wrote:
Only watched the first 30 or so seconds but looked like to me the dumb-ass kid just wanted to start something so his video would go viral on youtube. Checked the youtube and it has over 3 million hits. Accomplished his goal. Good job.


You should have watched the whole video.
Not a dumb ass kid.
The police were abusive and admitted to each other that "he knew his rights and was innocent" and they harassed him for that.

I ran into the same thing in Tucson AZ.
 
Jul 9, 2013 14:00:11   #
eye2eye
 
What is "crazier" than that is the fact that trained police are not allowed to search your car without probable cause, but some dog jumping on your car and giving a little scratch, gives the police probable cause. I love dogs, but they are not always known for their communication skills, trained or otherwise. I think my dog is hungry, but he has to go to the bathroom.
Jul 9, 2013 14:02:07   #
TrainNut
 
eye2eye wrote:
What is "crazier" than that is the fact that trained police are not allowed to search your car without probable cause, but some dog jumping on your car and giving a little scratch, gives the police probable cause. I love dogs, but they are not always known for their communication skills, trained or otherwise. I think my dog is hungry, but he has to go to the bathroom.


:thumbup:
Jul 9, 2013 14:18:35   #
Wellhiem
 
I watched the whole thing and whilst I agree that he was trying to provoke the officers, it does highlight the fact that the police should be aware of what they are and are not allowed to do.
Jul 10, 2013 09:15:55   #
Croce (a regular here)
 
This post is mistitled. There is no "questionable" police action here. The police were clearly in contempt of the mans rights. They KNOW they need probable cause. They KNEW they had none. They intimidated the man knowing his questions were reasonable and politely and non threateningly posed. They battered him for answers to their questions while refusing his simple and reasonable request to know if he were being detained. They damaged his cars finish with a dog no smarter than a trained ape. They illegally detained without informing that they were detaining. They took possession of the vehicle and searched it with no right to do so. They did everything but plant contraband in the vehicle which is certainly not beyond the realm of possibility for people such as these police officers, so willing to display contempt for the rights of the man they were so clearly detaining and holding in custody along with his property. Yes, this post is mis titled.
Jul 10, 2013 09:17:18   #
dave.speeking
 
Act a little hinky, activate probable cause.
The kid got a lesson in "get what you ask for".
 
Jul 10, 2013 10:14:43   #
yhtomit
 
Lawyer up kid,errrr young man.
Jul 10, 2013 10:41:51   #
TedPaul
 
Cop was pissed and WRONG. Surprised he didn't use the " in plain view doctrine, claiming he saw an open can of beer, giving him probable cause. I had occasion to lecture Michigan State Police Sergaents class on this problem. I was appaled at the Attorney General's comments as to probable cause. both parties had a problem, the citizen had to stop, wait in line, questioned and delayed. The officer should understand his duty and rights in this No reason to think there was a drinking violation. Such as, bleary eyed, slurred speech and alcohol on his breath. Could not have unsteady on his feet. The young man could/ should have been understanding and cooperative. Who was wrong. Police
Jul 10, 2013 10:43:41   #
TedPaul
 
Cop was pissed and WRONG. Surprised he didn't use the " in plain view doctrine, claiming he saw an open can of beer, giving him probable cause. I had occasion to lecture Michigan State Police Sergaents class on this problem. I was appaled at the Attorney General's comments as to probable cause. both parties had a problem, the citizen had to stop, wait in line, questioned and delayed. The officer should understand his duty and rights in this No reason to think there was a drinking violation. Such as, bleary eyed, slurred speech and alcohol on his breath. Could not have unsteady on his feet. The young man could/ should have been understanding and cooperative. Who was wrong. Police
Jul 10, 2013 10:48:41   #
gmcase (a regular here)
 
Croce wrote:
This post is mistitled. There is no "questionable" police action here. The police were clearly in contempt of the mans rights. They KNOW they need probable cause. They KNEW they had none. They intimidated the man knowing his questions were reasonable and politely and non threateningly posed. They battered him for answers to their questions while refusing his simple and reasonable request to know if he were being detained. They damaged his cars finish with a dog no smarter than a trained ape. They illegally detained without informing that they were detaining. They took possession of the vehicle and searched it with no right to do so. They did everything but plant contraband in the vehicle which is certainly not beyond the realm of possibility for people such as these police officers, so willing to display contempt for the rights of the man they were so clearly detaining and holding in custody along with his property. Yes, this post is mis titled.
This post is mistitled. There is no "question... (show quote)


Yes and these are the goons that need to be rooted out, fired with complete loss of pensions, benefits,etc. A clear message and deterrent is all that will stop these over stepping brown shirts.
Page: 1 2 3 4 next>>
          
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2016 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.