Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jcboy3
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 936 next>>
May 19, 2024 08:24:02   #
Racmanaz wrote:
LOL You are a worthless human being, I use "human being" loosely in your case.


And there you have it. You just lie and slander to get your way. Your debasement is a sure sign of your immorality.
Go to
May 19, 2024 02:46:20   #
Racmanaz wrote:
Good Lord do you ever stop lying?? ID proponents use the SAME scientific methods as the non-ID crowd, but they just come to a different conclusion based on what is currently being observed in nature. The problem with you is that you repeat the same lie from other sources other than what the ID proponents are saying about their scientific philosophy on their own websites.


This statement demonstrates that you know nothing about science.
Go to
May 19, 2024 02:43:42   #
Racmanaz wrote:
"Information drives the development of life. But what is the source of that information? Could it have been produced by an unguided Darwinian evolutionary process? Or did it require intelligent design? The Information Enigma is a fascinating 21-minute documentary that probes the mystery of biological information, the challenge it poses to orthodox Darwinian theory, and the reason it points to intelligent design. The video features Dr. Stephen Meyer, and molecular biologist Douglas Axe, founder of the Biologic Institute. For more about intelligent design theory be sure to visit "Intelligent Design"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aA-FcnLsF1g
"Information drives the development of life. ... (show quote)


This is just more ID BS.
Go to
May 19, 2024 02:13:08   #
Racmanaz wrote:
You are a LIAR, all you have been doing is rejecting the ID theory as if it was absolutely NOT true or even a valid argument for the origin of life. You are such a LIAR. Not once did you ever say on here that ID could be true or even a valid theory. Your belief claim does not match your posts on any of the threads I posted on this subject. You say "There does not appear to be compelling evidence in favor of either of those two choices." Not once did you ever defend the ID theory but demonstrated your rejection of it, but you have in almost all instances defended the "opposing" side of this subject. You are lying again.
You are a LIAR, all you have been doing is rejecti... (show quote)


ID is not a valid theory. There are no testable hypotheses that support it.
Go to
May 19, 2024 02:11:40   #
Racmanaz wrote:
LOL Nope, it's YOU that believes in the abiogenesis BS magic fairytale.


Chemical evolution. Nothing magic about it. It seeks to explain the origin and development of life through chemistry.

"Intelligent Design". The premise is we don't know and can't figure it out and so it must be created by something else, but let's not bother trying to scientifically determine what that something else is.

"Intelligence Design". Rac speak due to sloppy thinking and lying.
Go to
May 19, 2024 02:07:54   #
Racmanaz wrote:
Well, it's about that time to ignore the idiot with his stupid juvenile BS. :)


You keep saying that you are going away, but it's always a lie.

Go ahead, go away. Good riddance.
Go to
May 19, 2024 02:06:07   #
Racmanaz wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_DbOL6jzec

"Dive deep into the cosmic mysteries with renowned physicist Roger Penrose as he explores the profound question: is there an eternal Creator who initiated the grand tapestry of the universe? Join us on an extraordinary journey through space, time, and the human mind as we unravel the enigma of existence itself."

"In this captivating discussion, Professor Penrose, a titan in the field of theoretical physics and recipient of the Nobel Prize in Physics, shares his groundbreaking insights into the origins of the cosmos. Drawing upon decades of research and contemplation, he presents compelling evidence and thought-provoking theories that challenge conventional notions about the nature of reality."

"From the mind-bending concepts of quantum mechanics to the intricate patterns woven into the fabric of spacetime, each revelation offers a glimpse into the majesty and complexity of the universe. As we ponder the cosmic symphony that surrounds us, we confront profound questions about our place in the cosmos and the existence of a higher intelligence guiding it all."

"Join us as we embark on a quest for truth, guided by the wisdom of one of the greatest scientific minds of our time. Whether you're a seasoned scholar or an inquisitive explorer, prepare to be inspired, enlightened, and forever changed by the profound insights shared in this thought-provoking conversation."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_DbOL6jzec br br... (show quote)


Penrose does not appear in that blatantly deceptive and lying video.


Penrose doesn't care about God, because God does not appear in any of the equations of Quantum Mechanics.


And that is the answer to your stupid question.
Go to
May 19, 2024 02:00:59   #
Racmanaz wrote:
You obviously did read the article, You just want to push your BS lies. The only arrogant BS lies is coming from YOU.


Wrong again. You're the liar.
Go to
May 19, 2024 01:57:50   #
Racmanaz wrote:
lol of course it’s stupid. I posted what you believe which is completely stupid and irrational just like you are.


That's what you believe. Magic.

You are a liar.
Go to
May 19, 2024 01:56:10   #
Racmanaz wrote:
Goodness who gives a crap, I copy and paste titles about 90% of the time and maybe I didn’t with this one even though I thought I did. Who gives a crap. You’re so petty about stuff because you can’t address the issues. You have such a immature juvenile little mind. What are you in your 70s 80s? Oh, by the way, you are an idiot


You are the idiot that can't get even the simplest thing right. Complex thoughts? Forget about it.
Go to
May 19, 2024 01:47:56   #
Racmanaz wrote:
No, I don’t believe that life and consciousness magically developed (evolved) from nonliving chemicals and matter. That right there is pure stupidity and rubbish. There’s absolutely no evidence such an event occurred. You believe in that fairytale rubbish.


This is yet another stupid post. All your posts are stupid.
Go to
May 19, 2024 01:45:17   #
Racmanaz wrote:
MGYRS


I wasn't the idiot that posted that crap video and couldn't get the title right.

You could have copy and pasted it, but you didn't. But then you lied about it, right there plain as day.

Stupid rubbish faux creationism garbage.
Go to
May 19, 2024 01:42:53   #
Racmanaz wrote:
Same BS again, you keep repeated the same BS over and over again. Doing so doesn’t make ot true, maybe with the exception of your eyes.

These are the facts of ID.

Intelligent design refers to a scientific research program as well as a community of scientists, philosophers and other scholars who seek evidence of design in nature. The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection. Through the study and analysis of a system’s components, a design theorist is able to determine whether various natural structures are the product of chance, natural law, intelligent design, or some combination thereof. Such research is conducted by observing the types of information produced when intelligent agents act. Scientists then seek to find objects which have those same types of informational properties which we commonly know come from intelligence. Intelligent design has applied these scientific methods to detect design in irreducibly complex biological structures, the complex and specified information content in DNA, the life-sustaining physical architecture of the universe, and the geologically rapid origin of biological diversity in the fossil record during the Cambrian explosion approximately 530 million years ago.
See the entry on intelligent design at New World Encyclopedia or at Encyclopedia.com.
IS INTELLIGENT DESIGN CREATIONISM?
No. The theory of intelligent design is simply an effort to empirically detect whether the “apparent design” in nature acknowledged by virtually all biologists is genuine design (the product of an intelligent cause) or is simply the product of an undirected process such as natural selection acting on random variations. Creationism typically starts with a religious text and tries to see how the findings of science can be reconciled to it. Intelligent design starts with the empirical evidence of nature and seeks to ascertain what inferences can be drawn from that evidence. Unlike creationism, the scientific theory of intelligent design does not claim that modern biology can identify whether the intelligent cause detected through science is supernatural.
Honest critics of intelligent design acknowledge the difference between intelligent design and creationism. University of Wisconsin historian of science Ronald Numbers is critical of intelligent design, yet according to the Associated Press, he “agrees the creationist label is inaccurate when it comes to the ID [intelligent design] movement.” Why, then, do some Darwinists keep trying to conflate intelligent design with creationism? According to Dr. Numbers, it is because they think such claims are “the easiest way to discredit intelligent design.” In other words, the charge that intelligent design is “creationism” is a rhetorical strategy on the part of Darwinists who wish to delegitimize design theory without actually addressing the merits of its case.
IS INTELLIGENT DESIGN A SCIENTIFIC THEORY?
Yes. The scientific method is commonly described as a four-step process involving observations, hypothesis, experiments, and conclusion. Intelligent design begins with the observation that intelligent agents produce complex and specified information (CSI). Design theorists hypothesize that if a natural object was designed, it will contain high levels of CSI. Scientists then perform experimental tests upon natural objects to determine if they contain complex and specified information. One easily testable form of CSI is irreducible complexity, which can be discovered by experimentally reverse-engineering biological structures to see if they require all of their parts to function. When ID researchers find irreducible complexity in biology, they conclude that such structures were designed.
Same BS again, you keep repeated the same BS over ... (show quote)


You believe in stupid rubbish.
Go to
May 19, 2024 01:16:59   #
Racmanaz wrote:
You are useless.


And you are a stupid liar.
Go to
May 19, 2024 01:16:18   #
Racmanaz wrote:
Those weren't my words you illiterate, that is the title of the YouTube video minus the last two words which didn't
copy and post for some reason. Why not focus on the content instead of being an arrogant shyster?


This is the YouTube video title:

"Scientists Speak Out About Evidence of Intelligent Design in Nature"

This is your title:

"Scientist speak out about intelligent design"

You didn't copy and paste it, you stupid liar.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 936 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.